Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42268606›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Hospital System Acquisition of Physician Practices.

Gary J Young, Danielle Duran, Isabella Ratto, Laura Senier, Brady Post

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gary J YoungCenter for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Danielle DuranCenter for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Isabella RattoLondon School of Economics & Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
Laura SenierDepartment of Public Health and Health Sciences, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brady PostCenter for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

AHRQ HHS K01 HS029278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: More than 50% of physicians currently work for hospital systems compared with 20% in 2010, a shift driven in large part by hospital acquisitions of physician practices. These acquisitions have been linked to higher prices for physician and hospital services, and the evidence regarding their impact on quality of care has been mixed; however, there is little research regarding the perspectives of key stakeholders regarding such acquisitions. Objective: To provide systematic evidence on the motivation for and impact of physician practice acquisitions from hospital system leaders and physicians who are directly involved in these transactions. Design, Setting, and Participants: A qualitative research design was used for the study. Data collection occurred between December 2024 and April 2025. A purposive sample of 3 hospital systems that each had experience with physician practice acquisitions was included. Interviews were conducted with hospital system leaders and employed physicians who had been members of an acquired practice. Main Outcomes and Measures: Semistructured interview guides were used covering motivations for acquisitions, implications for patient care, and operational challenges. Coded data were analyzed to identify major themes. Results: A total of 37 interviews were conducted of 18 hospital system leaders and 19 employed physicians (26 male and 11 female). Both hospital leaders and physicians reported that practice acquisitions were most often initiated by physicians because of concerns about the financial viability of their practices. Hospital leaders and physicians also perceived that practice acquisitions improved care for patients, for example by uniting clinicians through a common electronic health record or colocating primary care and behavioral health services. Operationally, hospital leaders expressed frustration with employed physicians' productivity, whereas employed physicians complained of being sidelined in decisions about practice support and work schedules. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of hospital acquisitions of physician practices, acquisitions were largely initiated by physicians seeking to leave independent practice. The acquisitions created opportunities to improve patient care, but efforts to integrate physicians after acquisition were impeded by ongoing tensions over physician productivity and autonomy. Physician practice acquisitions hold promise for improving patient care if various operational challenges on integrating acquired practices can be resolved.

Indexed as

Health Facility MergerPhysiciansFemaleHumansMaleMotivationQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42268606
PMCPMC13254735

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.