ArticlePublic health genomics2026
Family Leaders Navigate Burden to Communicate Risk during Cascade Screening after Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young.
Article in Public health genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRelatives of a victim of sudden cardiac death in the young (SCDY) may be at risk for hereditary cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias; effective communication of cardiac risk is imperative. Family leaders are often responsible for communicating risk to surviving family during a difficult time. Cascade screening uptake is low among at-risk family members; identifying barriers of risk communication can help improve strategies. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to explore barriers and facilitators to communication about cascade screening in families who have lost a family member to SCDY.
methodsSemi-structured interviews (n = 14) were conducted with family members of an SCDY decedent. Participants were recruited from the Sudden Arrhythmia Death Syndrome advocacy group. Interviews explored the facilitators, challenges, and proposed interventions at different stages of risk communication. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using conventional content analysis.
resultsFive categories were identified from the interviews: 1. Participants understood fundamental risks, but the clinical variability in arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy was difficult to interpret and convey; 2. family leaders felt some family disregarded risk information; 3. grief interfered with family leader's ability to understand and communicate risk information; 4. communication aids were insufficient stand-alone interventions; 5. families advocated for a "genetic family navigator."
conclusionThis study provides new insight into cardiac risk communication between adult family members after an SCDY. Five categories provide practical strategies to improve clinical care and communication for families after SCDY and emphasize the need for genetic family navigators to facilitate cascade screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.