SynthesisPloS one2026
Causes of medication errors in community pharmacies: A meta-ethnography and systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMedication errors are a leading cause of patient harm and account for thousands of deaths and injuries annually. While medication safety efforts have primarily targeted hospital settings, community pharmacies are also prone to such errors due to their high patient access and utilisation. This review utilised a meta-ethnographic qualitative approach to synthesise findings from available primary qualitative research about the causes of medication safety issues and errors in community pharmacies as well as the contributing factors. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis meta-ethnographic systematic review was conducted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the meta-ethnography reporting guidance (eMERGe) and framework and registered on PROSPERO. Eligible studies were identified using a comprehensive search strategy across multiple databases and grey literature sources, without language or date restrictions. Qualitative data were synthesised using Noblit and Hare's seven-phase meta-ethnographic approach, generating third-order constructs that captured underlying causes of medication errors in community pharmacies. Confidence in the findings was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual framework.
resultsThirteen studies were included in the review with the majority from the United States and England. Most studies (n = 10) used qualitative research designs while two studies utilised a mixed-methods approach. Through meta-ethnographic synthesis, five third-order constructs (themes) were developed to represent the factors contributing to medication errors in community pharmacies. These themes included: 1) pharmacist-related factors, 2) the environment within the pharmacy 3) management and financial related factors 4) organisational and social environment within the pharmacy and 5) challenges with digital technologies.
conclusionsThis meta-ethnographic systematic review identified five themes contributing to medication errors in community pharmacies. The review findings offer valuable insight for guiding the design of future tailored safety initiatives. Understanding the complex interplay between these contributing factors is essential for enhancing medication safety and informing future research and practice in real-life community pharmacy settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.