ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Lexical Search and Retrieval in Aphasia: A Computational Analysis of Semantic Fluency.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEffectively searching among related items in memory is a hallmark of neurotypical cognition, and analyses of retrieval patterns in the semantic fluency task have provided invaluable insight into how individuals navigate an interconnected conceptual-lexical network. However, few studies have assessed retrieval patterns in the semantic fluency task among people with aphasia (PWA).
methodIn the present work, we used computational modeling to investigate the types of lexical information healthy controls (
resultsCompared to neurotypical controls, PWA produced fewer items, and consecutive items were less phonologically similar. Computational modeling of search behavior indicated that, whereas controls primarily used phonology to search within local clusters of related items, PWA were influenced by phonology both within clusters and at switch points. We also found that verbal semantic comprehension (measured via synonymy triplet scores) was negatively associated with average consecutive phonological similarity in the semantic fluency task, suggesting that PWA with impaired conceptual-lexical access may be more likely to exploit phonological similarity as a compensatory measure.
conclusionAltogether, the results indicate that individuals with aphasia struggle with adapting search cues during the semantic fluency task compared to neurotypical speakers, and the present work showcases the utility of the computational modeling approach for characterizing semantic memory search in neurotypical and language-impaired populations. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32560047.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.