ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Ethical Governance of Large Language Models in Health Care: Trust, Responsibility, and Equity in Routine Use.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Large language models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly embedded in routine health care communication, raising ethical challenges that extend beyond model performance alone. This Viewpoint argues that ethical risks in LLM-enabled health care emerge through patterns of reliance, institutional embedding, and governance during real-world use. Using "adoption-phase ethics" as an analytic lens, this paper examines 3 interrelated dimensions of ethical risk. First, trust in LLM-enabled health care is shaped not only by technical accuracy, but also by institutional and relational conditions surrounding its use. Second, responsibility may become distributed and ambiguous when LLM-mediated information influences clinical communication and decision-making. Third, equity concerns arise from unequal capacities to interpret, contest, and benefit from LLM-generated information. We argue that ethical governance of LLMs in health care requires continuous, system-level oversight that extends beyond model evaluation alone, including clear accountability structures, role-sensitive implementation, and equity-oriented governance practices. By reframing ethical analysis around routine integration rather than technical performance alone, this Viewpoint aims to support more responsible and sustainable use of LLMs in health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.