Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270639›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Cortex-specific inversion of visual responses during sleep.

Nicholas G Cicero, Michaela Klimova, Louis Vinke, Sam Ling, Laura D Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas G CiceroGraduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6382-7353
Michaela KlimovaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, USA.
Louis VinkeDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2424-5312
Sam LingGraduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, USA. samling@bu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6735-2508
Laura D LewisInstitute for Medical Engineering and Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA. ldlewis@mit.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4003-0277

Funding

Viral Tool Development Core: Visualization and manipulation of brain fluid dynamics by recombinant viral vectorsU19NS128613 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Laura Diane Lewis · 2022 to 2026
$13.6M
How Does Normalization Regulate Visual Competition?R01EY028163 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SAM LING · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Investigating the Effect of Arousal on Visual ProcessingR01EY035640 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Janneke Jehee, SAM LING · 2024 to 2026
$1.0M
Ascending Arousal Network Control of Sleep-Wake Structure in Humans Using Simultaneous EEG and High-Resolution fMRIF31NS139696 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Nicholas Gregory Cicero · 2024 to 2026
$74k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028163NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035640NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS139696NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS128613U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) F31NS139696U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01EY028163U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) U19NS128613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During sleep, we functionally disengage from our external environment. Our eyes close, profoundly reducing visual input to the brain. However, some light passes through the eyelid, and luminance changes are perceived even through closed eyes during wakefulness. Although the relay of sensory information is thought to be gated by the thalamus during sleep, sensory information can still reach the cortex. To elucidate how visual inputs are modulated at each stage of thalamic and cortical processing during sleep, we used simultaneous EEG-fMRI while presenting luminance-modulated visual stimuli to sleeping humans. We discovered that responses to light remained intact in the visual thalamus during N1 and N2 sleep. However, stimulus-evoked responses in early visual cortex were profoundly suppressed, exhibiting an inverted pattern in which high-intensity visual stimulation evoked visual cortical deactivation. These findings suggest a cortical mechanism where inhibitory circuits regulate stimulus-driven deactivation in visual cortex, facilitating sensory isolation during early stages of sleep.

Indexed as

SleepVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationThalamusWakefulnessYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42270639
PMCPMC13402605

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.