Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270659›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Natural selection, genetic drift, and trait correlation shaped hominin midfoot evolution.

Klara Komza, Bence Viola, Lauren Schroeder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Klara KomzaDepartment of Anthropology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. klara.komza@dartmouth.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0734-3308
Bence ViolaDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8052-707X
Lauren SchroederDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6406-8096

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) Discovery Grant No. RGPIN-2020-04159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The foot has undergone significant morphological change throughout the hominin lineage as our extinct relatives evolved to walk upright. The midfoot displays key adaptations for terrestrial bipedal locomotion, and is therefore considered a target of natural selection. Prior work suggests that early selection for bipedalism targeted the lateral elements of the foot, but that later, among australopiths, these elements were less morphologically diverse, and less influenced by directional selection than medial elements. Here, we apply methods from quantitative genetics to test which evolutionary processes (directional vs. stabilizing selection) shaped hominin midfoot diversification under a null hypothesis of genetic drift. Results demonstrate that the lateral midfoot may have been the primary target of selection for bipedalism in Ardipithecus ramidus, but that later in the hominin lineage, there is no consistent evidence that the lateral elements were less influenced by directional selection. Instead, we find a complex interaction of evolutionary processes shaping midfoot diversification, characterized by genetic drift, directional selection, and indirect responses to selection based on correlation between different elements. In sum, we emphasize that narratives of the evolution of bipedalism should consider the role of genetic drift and correlation among skeletal elements, as both have been historically underestimated.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionFootGenetic DriftHominidaeSelection, GeneticAnimalsHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID42270659
PMCPMC13402662

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.