ArticleNature communications2026
Natural selection, genetic drift, and trait correlation shaped hominin midfoot evolution.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The foot has undergone significant morphological change throughout the hominin lineage as our extinct relatives evolved to walk upright. The midfoot displays key adaptations for terrestrial bipedal locomotion, and is therefore considered a target of natural selection. Prior work suggests that early selection for bipedalism targeted the lateral elements of the foot, but that later, among australopiths, these elements were less morphologically diverse, and less influenced by directional selection than medial elements. Here, we apply methods from quantitative genetics to test which evolutionary processes (directional vs. stabilizing selection) shaped hominin midfoot diversification under a null hypothesis of genetic drift. Results demonstrate that the lateral midfoot may have been the primary target of selection for bipedalism in Ardipithecus ramidus, but that later in the hominin lineage, there is no consistent evidence that the lateral elements were less influenced by directional selection. Instead, we find a complex interaction of evolutionary processes shaping midfoot diversification, characterized by genetic drift, directional selection, and indirect responses to selection based on correlation between different elements. In sum, we emphasize that narratives of the evolution of bipedalism should consider the role of genetic drift and correlation among skeletal elements, as both have been historically underestimated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.