ArticleJournal of human hypertension2026
Systemic inflammation indices generated from first-trimester blood tests can be potential biomarkers for predicting preeclampsia.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, affecting 3 to 8% of pregnancies. Currently, no clinically useful predictive biomarker exists. Preeclampsia is characterised by systemic inflammatory responses that may be triggered by placental materials released into the maternal circulation, leading to an overly active maternal immune system. Recently, systemic inflammation indices have been used as indicators of inflammation in various diseases. Here, we investigated whether systemic inflammation indices derived from peripheral blood tests in the first trimester could serve as potential predictors of preeclampsia. Blood samples, ranging from 6 to 12 weeks, were collected from 109 women who later developed preeclampsia and 177 women who did not develop any complications. The counts of white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets were obtained, and systemic inflammation indices, including the systemic immune inflammation index (SII), the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the pan-immune inflammation value (PIV), were calculated. Significantly higher counts of white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes, but not eosinophils and basophils, were observed in women who later developed preeclampsia (p < 0.001). Additionally, all four indices were significantly elevated in women who later developed preeclampsia (p < 0.001). The increased indices were primarily associated with late-onset preeclampsia. No significant differences in these indices were observed between women who developed preeclampsia with or without severe features. Our study demonstrates that systemic inflammation indices derived from first-trimester blood tests may serve as additional predictors for preeclampsia when combined with other reported biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.