ArticleScientific reports2026
Cultivar dependent responses of olive (Olea europaea L.) to foliar fertilization in fruit quality and mineral composition of leaves and fruits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined cultivar-dependent responses to foliar fertilization in olive (Olea europaea L.) by jointly evaluating fruit morphology and skin colour, biochemical quality indicators, and mineral nutrient composition in leaves and fruits. Five cultivars (Arbequina, Frantoio, Ayvalık, Gemlik, and Edincik Su) were tested under five foliar treatments (Control, Bestline, Dermin, UAN-32, and Forceful Amino) in a factorial design. Cultivar, treatment, and their interaction significantly affected fruit size, colour parameters, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), antioxidant activity (AA), and the accumulation of multiple mineral elements (p < 0.05). Across treatments, UAN-32 increased fruit size overall (mean fruit weight 3.30 g). In contrast, Dermin and Bestline were more frequently associated with higher AA in specific cultivar combinations, indicating that increases in TPC and TFC did not necessarily translate into higher AA. Mineral profiling revealed treatment-related differences in element accumulation and partitioning: Bestline was often linked to higher fruit Fe-Mg-Zn concentrations, Dermin promoted Ca enrichment, and UAN-32 increased fruit K. Principal component analysis (PCA) further supported these patterns by separating cultivar × treatment combinations primarily along a fruit-size axis and a coordinated mineral-nutrient axis. Overall, responses to foliar fertilization were strongly cultivar dependent, highlighting the importance of optimizing cultivar-treatment combinations according to targeted production goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.