ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
The future is not always uniform: rethinking radiotherapy through spatial fractionation.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- VMAT-based lattice radiotherapy for advanced bulky hepatocellular carcinoma within multimodality treatment: a consecutive feasibility series.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiotherapy has traditionally been guided by the principle that uniform delivery of a tumoricidal dose across the entire target volume maximizes local control. However, this paradigm becomes increasingly constrained in the setting of large, bulky or anatomically complex tumours, in which non-malignant tissue tolerances often preclude homogeneous dose escalation. Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) has emerged as a complementary approach that introduces intentional intratumoural dose heterogeneity as an alternative therapeutic strategy when uniform irradiation is not feasible. SFRT involves the delivery of radiation as high-dose 'peaks' interspersed with lower-dose 'valleys', creating spatial domains that combine focal tumoricidal exposures with partial preservation of vascular, stromal and immune-related functions within the tumour microenvironment. Preclinical investigations and early clinical studies suggest that such architectures might be associated with rapid volumetric tumour regression, acceptable toxicity profiles and modulation of the tumour immune microenvironment, although the underlying mechanisms, generalizability and durability of these effects remain incompletely defined. In this Review, we summarize the conceptual foundations, biological hypotheses and clinical activity of SFRT, spanning macroscopic approaches such as GRID and lattice radiotherapy, biology-guided strategies and submillimetric implementations using minibeams and microbeams. We also highlight key translational and methodological limitations and discuss various challenges relating to dosimetry, biologically meaningful response assessments, patient selection and multicentre reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42270816What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.