ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
Trial design and end points in hepatocellular carcinoma: an EASL-AASLD-ILCA consensus statement.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has undergone radical change over the past decade. Immunotherapies now dominate the treatment of advanced-stage disease and are increasingly being evaluated in perioperative and intermediate-stage settings. However, in some instances, positive phase III trials have not translated into adoption by guidelines or regulatory agencies, highlighting the need to harmonize and update the current standards for trial design and end points. In response to these challenges, four scientific societies - the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the International Liver Cancer Association (ILCA) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) - appointed representatives to develop a consensus recommendations document addressing current unmet needs and future challenges in HCC trial design and end points. Through a modified Delphi process, 102 consensus statements were developed across several distinct domains: surveillance; early-stage, intermediate-stage and advanced-stage disease; transplant-related contexts; regulatory considerations; and emerging topics. The document rigorously defines target populations, stratification factors, control arms and benchmarks for expected clinical benefit. Collectively, this consensus is intended to provide a dynamic, evidence-based, multisociety roadmap for optimizing trial design, accelerating therapeutic development and improving clinically meaningful outcomes in patients with HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42270817What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.