Evidence mapPaperPMID 42270817Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026

Trial design and end points in hepatocellular carcinoma: an EASL-AASLD-ILCA consensus statement.

Josep M Llovet, Ezequiel Mauro, Lorenza Rimassa, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Matthias Pinter, Robin Kate Kelley, Stephen L Chan, Laura Kulik, Anjana Pillai, Lewis Roberts and 8 more

Abstract readConsensus StatementReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Josep M LlovetLiver Cancer Translational Research Group - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Liver Unit-Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. jmllovet@clinic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0547-2667
Ezequiel MauroLiver Cancer Translational Research Group - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Liver Unit-Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0757-7676
Lorenza RimassaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-3615
Vincenzo MazzaferroDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Matthias PinterDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7260-532X
Robin Kate KelleyHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-2430
Stephen L ChanState Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Laura KulikDepartment of Medicine (Gastroenterology and Hepatology), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anjana PillaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lewis RobertsDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7885-8574
Bruno SangroLiver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-6417
Teresa CasanovasEuropean Liver Patients' Association (ELPA), Barcelona, Spain.
David E KaplanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3839-336X
Arndt VogelDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Toronto General Hospital, Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0560-5538
Mark YarchoanThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4401-0748
Richard S FinnRoyal Free Hospital and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2494-2126
Tim MeyerDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Amit G SingalDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-3971

Funding

The Role of KLF6 in Hepatic FibrosisR01DK056621 · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · 2000 to 2005
$1.8M
Determinants of immunotherapy response in NASH-Hepatocellular carcinomaR01CA273932 · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · 2025 to 2025
$479k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA273932NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056621NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has undergone radical change over the past decade. Immunotherapies now dominate the treatment of advanced-stage disease and are increasingly being evaluated in perioperative and intermediate-stage settings. However, in some instances, positive phase III trials have not translated into adoption by guidelines or regulatory agencies, highlighting the need to harmonize and update the current standards for trial design and end points. In response to these challenges, four scientific societies - the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the International Liver Cancer Association (ILCA) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) - appointed representatives to develop a consensus recommendations document addressing current unmet needs and future challenges in HCC trial design and end points. Through a modified Delphi process, 102 consensus statements were developed across several distinct domains: surveillance; early-stage, intermediate-stage and advanced-stage disease; transplant-related contexts; regulatory considerations; and emerging topics. The document rigorously defines target populations, stratification factors, control arms and benchmarks for expected clinical benefit. Collectively, this consensus is intended to provide a dynamic, evidence-based, multisociety roadmap for optimizing trial design, accelerating therapeutic development and improving clinically meaningful outcomes in patients with HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularClinical Trials as TopicLiver NeoplasmsResearch DesignEndpoint DeterminationHumans

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.