Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272126›Full record

ArticleRenal failure2026

Predicting long-term allograft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients using a machine learning approach: a 5-year retrospective cohort study.

Xinyi Gao, Jingru Chen, Meifang Wang, Zheng Li, Xiaowei Lou, Jianghua Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinyi GaoKidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jingru ChenKidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Meifang WangKidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zheng LiKidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaowei LouKidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jianghua ChenKidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term outcomes of kidney allografts vary significantly among deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, and current prediction tools struggle to integrate comprehensive pre- and post-transplant factors. Extended longitudinal follow-up data beyond five years remains particularly scarce in kidney transplantation research despite being crucial for understanding true long-term outcomes. To address this, we developed and validated machine learning models to predict 5-year allograft survival using a distinctive cohort of 940 adult deceased donor kidney transplantation recipients with extended follow-up exceeding 5 years. Two predictive models were developed: a pre-transplant model (Kidney Allograft Prediction of Transplant Outcome Risk, KAPTOR-pre) using pre-transplant donor-recipient matching data, and a 1-year landmark conditional prediction model (KAPTOR-full) incorporating both pre- and post-transplant parameters, pathological data, and laboratory markers from the first year. KAPTOR-full achieved excellent discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.904, while KAPTOR-pre performed well at 0.813. In internal validation, both models showed higher C-index and improved risk stratification compared with established prognostic tools including KDPI. The extended follow-up period allowed internal assessment of model performance for 5-year outcomes. Ultimately, our models integrating routine clinical variables demonstrated excellent predictive performance for long-term graft survival. While the pre-transplant model achieved good discrimination, the addition of first-year post-transplant data significantly enhanced predictive accuracy. Both models outperformed existing tools in internal validation and may support personalized risk assessment, pending independent multicenter validation.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMachine LearningAdultAllograftsFemaleGraft RejectionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentclinical decision supportdeceased donorKidney transplantationmachine learningprognosis prediction

Identifiers

PMID42272126
PMCPMC13262102

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.