ArticleRenal failure2026
Predicting long-term allograft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients using a machine learning approach: a 5-year retrospective cohort study.
Article in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term outcomes of kidney allografts vary significantly among deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, and current prediction tools struggle to integrate comprehensive pre- and post-transplant factors. Extended longitudinal follow-up data beyond five years remains particularly scarce in kidney transplantation research despite being crucial for understanding true long-term outcomes. To address this, we developed and validated machine learning models to predict 5-year allograft survival using a distinctive cohort of 940 adult deceased donor kidney transplantation recipients with extended follow-up exceeding 5 years. Two predictive models were developed: a pre-transplant model (Kidney Allograft Prediction of Transplant Outcome Risk, KAPTOR-pre) using pre-transplant donor-recipient matching data, and a 1-year landmark conditional prediction model (KAPTOR-full) incorporating both pre- and post-transplant parameters, pathological data, and laboratory markers from the first year. KAPTOR-full achieved excellent discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.904, while KAPTOR-pre performed well at 0.813. In internal validation, both models showed higher C-index and improved risk stratification compared with established prognostic tools including KDPI. The extended follow-up period allowed internal assessment of model performance for 5-year outcomes. Ultimately, our models integrating routine clinical variables demonstrated excellent predictive performance for long-term graft survival. While the pre-transplant model achieved good discrimination, the addition of first-year post-transplant data significantly enhanced predictive accuracy. Both models outperformed existing tools in internal validation and may support personalized risk assessment, pending independent multicenter validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.