ArticleCureus2026
Hazardous Alcohol Consumption Depicted in YouTube Videos: A Content Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and objectives Social media platforms such as YouTube allow adolescents and young adults to document substance use and share related beliefs with large audiences. This study primarily aimed to identify and describe hazardous alcohol consumption methods depicted in highly viewed YouTube videos. Secondary exploratory objectives were to characterize the apparent demographic characteristics of on-screen performers, quantify video popularity and engagement, and evaluate the quality, reliability, and scientific accuracy of alcohol-related information presented in these videos. Methods We conducted a retrospective content analysis of YouTube videos identified between January and March 2025 using 48 search terms related to hazardous alcohol use. Key variables included the number of views, the number and apparent characteristics of participants, and the method of alcohol consumption depicted. Video content and quality were assessed using the global quality score (GQS) and a modified DISCERN reliability score, and explicit scientific claims were classified as substantiated or unsubstantiated by two board‑certified toxicologists. Results A total of 278 videos involving 15 distinct methods of alcohol consumption were analyzed, most of which met predefined criteria for hazardous use. Risky practices included alcohol inhalation, alcohol enemas, vodka eyeballing, drunkorexia, funneling, drinking hand sanitizer, marijuana moonshine, and alcohol‑soaked tampons, among others. Only three videos (1.1%) contained trigger warnings. Collectively, the videos were viewed 75 million times (mean 269,784 views) and liked five million times, and they featured 722 participants or observers, predominantly male, Caucasian, and aged 21-25 years. The median GQS and reliability scores were 1 (interquartile range or IQR 2-3) and 1 (IQR 1-2), respectively, and 78.7% (159/202) of scientific claims in informational videos conflicted with published toxicology literature. Interrater agreement was substantial to excellent (Cohen's kappa 0.66-0.76). Conclusions Hazardous alcohol use is highly visible in popular YouTube videos, which rarely include accurate risk information or explicit harm‑reduction messages. These low‑quality, often misleading depictions suggest that YouTube and similar platforms may contribute to alcohol‑related informational environment for the youth and serve as venues for future efforts to address misinformation and hazardous drinking norms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.