Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272724›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Auditory rhetoric in music: a perceptual framework for music-induced prosocial behavior.

Jun-Yi Chen, Ting-Ting Liu, Xin-Wen Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jun-Yi ChenFuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fuzhou, China.
Ting-Ting LiuChengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.
Xin-Wen YaoFuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music has been widely associated with prosocial behavior, including empathy, cooperation, and social bonding. Existing research has often explained these effects through specific mechanisms such as emotional responses, interpersonal synchrony, and neurophysiological processes. This study offers an alternative perspective by conceptualizing auditory rhetoric as a perceptual framework through which music organizes experience in ways relevant to prosociality. Drawing on research in music perception, attention, and emotion, this paper argues that music can be understood as a structured perceptual system that shapes how individuals attend to, interpret, and experience their environment. Within this framework, auditory rhetoric operates through three interrelated dimensions: structural organization, affective shaping, and attentional guidance. These dimensions help account for forms of perceptual alignment, including temporal, affective, and attentional alignment across individuals. Such alignment can support a shift toward relational orientation, characterized by a shared experiential frame and a reduced distinction between self and others. From this perspective, empathy, cooperation, social bonding, and prosocial decision-making become more likely when music helps establish these interpersonal conditions. By integrating perceptual, affective, and social processes within a more connected explanatory structure, this study provides an empirically informed framework for understanding how music contributes to prosocial behavior. This perspective contributes to the psychological understanding of music by framing prosociality in relation to perceptual organization rather than isolated mechanisms. It also highlights the importance of cultural context and musical features in shaping these processes, suggesting directions for future research in music psychology, social cognition, and cross-cultural studies.

Indexed as

auditory rhetoricempathymusic cognitionmusic perceptionperceptual alignmentprosocial behaviorrelational orientationsocial bonding

Identifiers

PMID42272724
PMCPMC13246603

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.