ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Early but not late time-restricted eating improves an actigraphy-estimated sleep quality in women with overweight or obesity: secondary analysis of the crossover ChronoFast trial.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04351672 (Time-restricted Feeding as a Dietary Strategy Against Metabolic Disturbances in Humans), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Time-restricted Feeding as a Dietary Strategy Against Metabolic Disturbances in Humans
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic disorders are closely linked to sleep disturbances. Time-restricted eating (TRE) can improve metabolic disturbances, but its impact on sleep quality is insufficiently studied and recommendations regarding the eating timing in TRE are pending. Our aim was to investigate the impact of early TRE (eTRE) and late TRE (lTRE) on sleep quality in obesity. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the randomized crossover trial, which included 31 women with overweight and obesity. Following a 2-4 week baseline period, participants were assigned to either a two-week eTRE (eating 8 a.m-4 p.m.) or a two-week lTRE (eating 1 p.m.-9 p.m.), separated by a two-week washout phase. Sleep metrics were assessed objectively by blinded actigraphy and subjectively using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and self-report of sleep quality. Hunger and satiety were examined using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results: Actigraphy revealed no between-intervention differences in changes in sleep metrics, but improvements were observed within eTRE compared with baseline for sleep efficiency ( Conclusions: eTRE, but not lTRE, improved objectively assessed sleep quality, and these changes were not related to hunger or satiety. eTRE may be a more effective strategy for improving wellbeing and sleep-related health outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04351672 (registered on April 17, 2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.