Evidence mapPaperPMID 42272999Full record

ReviewTouchREVIEWS in endocrinology2026

Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Diabetes and Kidney Stones: Strengthening Links Over Time?

Ides M Colin, Agnieszka Pozdzik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ides M ColinREMEDIAB Center, CHU HELORA, Mons, Belgium.
Agnieszka PozdzikREMEDIAB Center, CHU HELORA, Mons, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long considered separate entities, obesity/type 2 diabetes/metabolic syndrome and kidney stone disease are now recognized as interconnected conditions, both from an epidemiological and pathophysiological perspective. Although the pathophysiological mechanisms between visceral obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes are well established, the link with an increased propensity to develop kidney stones may appear less clear at first glance. Over the past decade, data from retrospective analyses and prospective cohort studies have clarified the nature and the magnitude of this relationship. The common threads linking these pathophysiological entities, apparently distinct at first sight, are insulin resistance and systemic low-grade inflammation, which should be considered as the unifying pathological roots. Within the kidney, higher urinary levels of oxalate, calcium and uric acid, combined with a fall in urine pH, increase supersaturation of lithogenic salts. If unopposed, this physicochemical imbalance drives crystal nucleation, growth and aggregation, leading to precipitation of insoluble salts and, ultimately, to stone formation. This narrative review presents epidemiological and pathophysiological evidence that helps understand the extent to which seemingly unrelated conditions are, in fact, part of a broader metabolic disorder, the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome, in which kidney stone disease can likely be integrated because common pathophysiological features are shared. The question then arises as to whether weight loss and modern treatments for type 2 diabetes, in particular glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, influence the lithogenic risk.

Indexed as

Cardiometabolic syndromediabetes mellitusGLP-1 receptor agonistsnephrolithiasisobesitypharmacological mechanisms of actionsodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitorstype 2

Identifiers

PMID42272999
PMCPMC13249147

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.