ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Impact of data augmentation size on deep learning-based third lumbar vertebra computed tomography skeletal muscle segmentation performance.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Various deep learning (DL) models have been proposed for skeletal muscle segmentation at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) on computed tomography (CT) images, typically incorporating data augmentation to improve model robustness and mitigate overfitting. However, the impact of augmentation size on model performance remains unclear. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate this impact and provide evidence-based guidance for selecting appropriate augmentation sizes. Methods: A total of 400 patients diagnosed with rectal or cervical cancer were included, each with a pelvic CT series acquired using a clinical CT scanner. For each patient, skeletal muscle regions were manually annotated on three consecutive axial CT images at the L3 level to serve as ground truth. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test sets comprising 280, 60, and 60 patients, respectively. Ten experimental groups (Labs 1-10) were established by varying the number of augmented images included in the training set to represent different augmentation sizes. Lab 1 contained only the original images. To create Labs 2-10, each original training image was augmented up to nine times using random combinations of horizontal flipping, translation, scaling, and Gaussian noise addition. Specifically, Labs 2-9 incorporated 1-8 randomly selected augmented images per original image, while Lab 10 included all nine augmented images. To enhance experimental reliability, the dataset creation process for Labs 2-10 was repeated ten times. Three representative DL models-U-Net, attention U-Net, and attention V-Net-were trained on each group and evaluated on the same test set using five quantitative metrics: dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision, recall, 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and average surface distance (ASD). Results: Model performance generally improved with increasing augmentation size, accompanied by enhanced robustness in skeletal muscle morphology and boundary delineation. All three models achieved their best performance within Labs 7-10. The U-Net achieved the best averaged DSC, precision, recall, HD95, ASD values of 97.481%, 97.299%, 98.040%, 1.782 mm, and 0.268 mm, respectively. The attention U-Net achieved corresponding best values of 97.455%, 97.208%, 98.013%, 1.822 mm, and 0.270 mm, while the attention V-Net achieved 97.627%, 97.436%, 97.939%, 1.781 mm, and 0.250 mm, respectively. Conclusions: Data augmentation effectively improves DL model performance for L3 CT skeletal muscle segmentation. Based on systematic evaluation across ten augmentation sizes, an augmentation size of 6× or greater per L3 CT image is recommended to ensure high segmentation accuracy and robust generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.