ArticleInternational journal of genomics2026
Single Cell Transcriptomic Atlas Reveals Cellular Heterogeneity and Molecular Mechanisms in Pediatric Airway Hyperresponsiveness Epithelium.
Article in International journal of genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Single Cell Transcriptomic Atlas Reveals Cellular Heterogeneity and Molecular Mechanisms in Pediatric Airway Hyperresponsiveness Epithelium.International journal of genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a clinically important feature of chronic pediatric inflammatory airway disease, but its cellular architecture remains incompletely resolved. Because bulk transcriptomic approaches can mask signals from rare or state-specific cell populations, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) offers a useful framework for examining epithelial and immune cell diversity in hyperresponsive airways. Methods: Publicly available scRNA-seq data (GEO: GSM8722221) from bronchial brushing specimens of pediatric AHR patients (10x Genomics Chromium platform) were processed with Cell Ranger, quality-filtered, and analyzed using PCA (15 PCs), UMAP/tSNE embedding, and Leiden clustering (resolution = 0.8). Cell types were annotated by canonical markers and validated via Seurat label transfer. Pseudotime trajectories were inferred with Monocle (DDRTree) and validated by scVelo, Slingshot, and PAGA. Macrophage subpopulations were resolved at resolution = 1.2 and profiled by hdWGCNA. GO and KEGG enrichment used clusterProfiler (Benjamini-Hochberg; adjusted p <0.05). Network pharmacology integrated TCM BTMAN 2.0, Swiss Target Prediction, SEA, and PPI topology to identify targets and herbal compounds from Xiao Qing Long Tang. Results: Quality control supported the analytical suitability of the dataset (mitochondrial fraction vs. nCount_RNA r = -0.31; inter-dataset r = 0.96). Actb, Gapdh, Tuba1b, Hmga2, Vim, Col1a1, Zeb1, Snai2, Twist1, and Mmp9 were among the top variable genes, and the first 15 PCs were retained after JackStraw testing. UMAP and tSNE resolved eight airway mucosal cell populations with concordant separation. Cell-type-specific expression of TSLP, IL33, CCL26, S100A8, POSTN, CLCA1, FCGR3B, TNFRSF8, FOXJ1, and SCGB1A1 was consistent with known inflammatory, remodeling, and mucociliary programs. High-resolution macrophage analysis identified 23 putative subpopulations, which were interpreted cautiously as computationally defined states. Enrichment analysis highlighted cytoplasmic translation, ribosome biogenesis, oxidative phosphorylation, and related mitochondrial signatures. Network pharmacology identified VEGFA, PTGS2, and ESR1 among prioritized targets, yielding 83 shared candidates between disease-associated and compound-associated target sets. Conclusions: This study provides a pediatric AHR single-cell atlas and an integrated, hypothesis-generating view of epithelial-immune heterogeneity, macrophage state diversity, and candidate therapeutic networks. The findings should be interpreted as computational evidence that requires validation in healthy pediatric controls, independent cohorts, and functional experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.