Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273314›Full record

ArticleCirculation reports2026

In-Hospital and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Categorized as SCAI Shock Stage B.

Hisashi Sato, Kenichi Sakakura, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Yousuke Taniguchi, Kei Yamamoto, Takunori Tsukui, Masashi Hatori, Taku Kasahara, Yusuke Watanabe, Shun Ishibashi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hisashi SatoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Kenichi SakakuraDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Hiroyuki JinnouchiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Yousuke TaniguchiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Kei YamamotoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Takunori TsukuiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Masashi HatoriDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Taku KasaharaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Yusuke WatanabeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Shun IshibashiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Masaru SeguchiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.
Hideo FujitaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The mortality rate for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high despite advances in mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) has proposed a 5-stage classification of CS, and in this study we compared the clinical outcomes of AMI patients with SCAI shock stage A with those in stage B. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed 257 AMI patients, classified into modified stage A (n=180) and modified stage B (n=77) groups. The primary endpoint was in-hospital adverse events, defined as a composite of in-hospital death, initiation of MCS, and mechanical complications. The secondary endpoint was long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, re-admission for heart failure, or non-fatal myocardial infarction. The median follow-up duration was 786 days. Compared with modified stage A, modified stage B group had a significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (44.6% vs. 54.4%, P<0.001). In-hospital adverse events were comparable between the groups (P=0.128). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a higher incidence of MACE in modified stage B (P=0.029); however, multivariate analyses revealed no significant association between modified stage B and either in-hospital adverse events or long-term MACE. Conclusions: As compared to SCAI shock modified stage A, modified stage B was not independently associated with in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes after controlling confounding factors.

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarctionCardiogenic shockIn-hospital adverse eventsMajor adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock stage classification

Identifiers

PMID42273314
PMCPMC13249478

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.