ArticleFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2026
Development and internal validation of an interpretable machine-learning model for identifying comorbid atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetic kidney disease.
Article in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are at increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), yet tools to support identification of comorbid AF in this high-burden population remain limited. We aimed to develop and internally validate an interpretable machine-learning (ML) model for identifying concomitant AF in patients with DKD using routinely collected clinical data. Methods: In this retrospective two-center cohort study (January 2021 to October 2025), 787 unique records of patients with DKD were randomly divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. AF status was defined as documented atrial fibrillation coexisting with DKD and was ascertained using electrocardiograms, Holter monitoring when available, and ICD-10 diagnostic codes with physician adjudication. Candidate predictors were routine clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic variables. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used for feature selection in the training set. Seven supervised models were trained; performance was assessed by area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and decision-curve analysis. SHAP quantified feature contributions. Results: LASSO retained 14 features, including 24-hour urine total protein (24UTP), serum creatinine (SCr), age, and atrial dimensions. In the test set, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) model achieved an AUC of 0.927, with an accuracy of 0.886, sensitivity of 0.920, and specificity of 0.856. Calibration was satisfactory, and decision-curve analysis showed net benefit across commonly used thresholds. Five-fold cross-validation yielded mean AUC 0.90 ± 0.02. SHAP analysis identified proteinuria burden, renal dysfunction, age, and atrial size as major contributors to model output. The final model was translated into a preliminary web-based calculator based on routinely available inputs. Conclusions: An interpretable ML model incorporating routinely collected clinical and echocardiographic variables showed stable internal performance for identifying comorbid atrial fibrillation in patients with DKD. Because the model is intended to identify concomitant AF status rather than predict incident AF and has undergone internal validation only, further external and prospective validation is required before broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.