Evidence mapPaperPMID 42274152Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Understanding Equity in Cancer Prehabilitation Services in Wales: A Medical Record Review.

Shea Palmer, Alexandra Mitchell, Akhilesh Ramachandran, Nichola Gale, Sian Lewis, Manasi Patil, Nicholas Courtier, Jane Hopkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shea PalmerSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5190-3264
Alexandra MitchellSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Akhilesh RamachandranSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Nichola GaleSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Sian LewisAneurin Bevan University Health Board, Wales, UK.
Manasi PatilSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Nicholas CourtierSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Jane HopkinsonSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3915-9815

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR151668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer prehabilitation prepares people for cancer treatment by promoting physical activity, eating well and emotional wellbeing. Evidence shows that prehabilitation before and during cancer treatment reduces treatment complications and improves outcomes, including survival. However, the availability of and patient engagement with prehabilitation is variable. People from lower socioeconomic and minority ethnic backgrounds are at greater risk of poor health outcomes from diseases like cancer and are less likely to engage with prehabilitation services. Access, acceptance and adherence to prehabilitation for all cancer patients is important for progress towards equity in treatment outcomes. Understanding how prehabilitation services are currently delivered is an important first step in improving cancer health equity. The medical record review reported here was conducted as part of case study research on equity of cancer prehabilitation services in Wales.

aimsTo describe cancer prehabilitation services delivered across the National Health Service (NHS) in Wales, with a view to understanding issues related to health equity. METHODS AND

resultsData were collected from medical records for all patients who attended an initial cancer prehabilitation consultation over a four-week period at each of seven NHS providers. Patients were included if they were adults referred for prehabilitation with a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal, colorectal, lung, prostate or breast cancer and were awaiting active or palliative treatment. Data extracted for each patient included demographics, cancer site and the components of prehabilitation received. The Charlson Comorbidity Index and Index of Multiple Deprivation were calculated. Descriptive statistics and correlational analysis were used. A total of 134 individual patient cases were included. Of these, 63% had colorectal cancer, 22% upper gastrointestinal cancer and 12% lung cancer. Mean age was 68 years, with 56% men and 44% women. Forty-two percent were from the two most deprived quintiles, whilst 100% of patients with a recorded ethnicity were White-neither figure is representative of cancer cases in Wales. There was wide variability across services in the type and duration of prehabilitation received. An estimated 14% of patients newly diagnosed with the included cancers in Wales accessed prehabilitation.

conclusionThe findings demonstrate a highly variable prehabilitation offer in Wales. Targeted efforts are required to improve uptake among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups to enhance cancer treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Health EquityNeoplasmsPreoperative ExerciseSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWalescancerethnicityhealth equityprehabilitationsocioeconomic

Identifiers

PMID42274152
PMCPMC13255152

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.