ReviewInfectious diseases and therapy2026
Infections in Burn Patients: Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Contemporary Therapeutic Strategies in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance.
Review in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Burn injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, largely driven by infectious complications. Disruption of the skin barrier, systemic inflammation, and postburn immunosuppression promote microbial colonization and progression to local and systemic infections, a challenge further exacerbated by the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Patients with extensive burns, inhalation injury, prolonged hospitalization, and invasive device use are particularly vulnerable. The microbiological profile of burn wound infections evolves dynamically, shifting from early Gram-positive predominance to Gram-negative and multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, including members of the ESKAPE group, in later stages. Effective management, therefore, requires an integrated approach combining early surgical intervention, strict infection control measures, continuous microbiological surveillance, and targeted antimicrobial therapy. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the pathophysiology, risk factors, and microbiological dynamics of burn-associated infections, alongside contemporary prevention and treatment strategies, including topical therapies, advanced biomaterials, systemic antibiotic approaches, and antimicrobial stewardship. Emerging strategies such as nanoparticle-based systems and artificial intelligence-driven predictive models highlight a shift toward precision medicine in burn care; however, their clinical translation remains limited by insufficient validation and standardization. In conclusion, optimizing outcomes in burn-associated infections will depend on integrating evidence-based clinical practices with innovative technologies, while reinforcing antimicrobial stewardship and developing validated predictive tools to address the growing burden of antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.