ArticlePloS one2026
Low Handgrip strength and its lifestyle and physiological correlates among Taiwanese University Students: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Handgrip strength is a well-established indicator of muscular fitness and an early predictor of adverse long-term health outcomes. However, limited research has examined HGS and its determinants among young adults in East Asia. This cross-sectional study investigated the association between lifestyle and physiological factors and low HGS in 501 Taiwanese university students aged 18-25 (168 men, 333 women). Participants completed questionnaires on physical activity, sedentary time, and dietary behavior, and underwent anthropometric measurements including body mass index (BMI), mid-upper arm circumference, and handgrip strength. Low handgrip strength was defined using the sex-specific criteria established by the Asian Sarcopenia Working Group in 2019 (men < 28 kg; women <18 kg). Results showed that 6.2% of participants had low handgrip strength (8.3% in men, 5.1% in women). Men had significantly higher average handgrip strength than women (38.0 ± 7.8 kg vs. 24.6 ± 4.4 kg, p < .001). Upper arm circumference and handgrip strength showed the strongest correlation in both sexes (p < .001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that smaller upper arm circumference (OR = 0.80, p = .003 per 1 cm increase), insufficient moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (OR = 0.40, p = .055), and male sex (OR = 5.28, p = .001) were significantly associated with poor handgrip strength. Dietary habits and sedentary time were not significantly associated with handgrip strength. These findings highlight the importance of early identification of muscle weakness and promoting physical fitness training in young adults. Men with smaller arm circumference and lower activity levels showed a significant association with low HGS and may benefit from early monitoring and targeted intervention. Incorporating muscle strength assessment and activity promotion into early adulthood health programs may help preserve muscular fitness, prevent future sarcopenia, and support healthier aging trajectories in East Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.