ArticlePLoS genetics2026
FEMA-Long: Modeling unstructured covariances for discovery of time-dependent effects in large-scale longitudinal datasets.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early-childhood temperament trajectories map onto transdiagnostic psychiatric risk.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Strategies for collection, management, and release of data for multi-site longitudinal studies: Lessons from the ABCD Data Analysis, Informatics, & Resource Center.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study: Ten years of statistical and methodological contributions.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- A decade of discovery: Leveraging genomic data in the ABCD study to illuminate adolescent neurodevelopment.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Can Psychiatric Genetics Advance Without Incorporating a Life Course Perspective?Biological psychiatry · 2026Review
- Nonlinear associations between body mass index and brain microstructure across adolescence in the ABCD Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Early-childhood temperament deviations mark psychiatric risk into early adulthood.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While linear mixed-effects (LME) models are common for analyzing longitudinal data, most users rely on random intercepts or simple stationary covariance, due to unavailability of computationally tractable solutions. Here, we extend the Fast and Efficient Mixed-Effects Algorithm (FEMA) and present FEMA-Long, a computationally tractable approach to flexibly modeling longitudinal covariance suitable for high-dimensional data. FEMA-Long can: i) model unstructured covariance, ii) model covariates as smooth functions using splines, iii) discover time-dependent effects of covariates with spline interactions, and iv) use these flexible longitudinal modeling strategies to perform longitudinal genome-wide association studies and discover time-dependent genetic effects, in a computationally scalable manner, suitable for high-dimensional data. Through extensive simulations, we show that estimates from FEMA-Long are accurate, while being up to several thousand times faster and with minimal carbon footprint. To show the utility of FEMA-Long for discovering novel biological signal, using data from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), we performed a longitudinal genome-wide association study with non-linear SNP-by-time interaction on length, weight, and BMI of 68,273 infants with up to six measurements in the first year of life. We found dynamic patterns of random effects including time-varying heritability and genetic correlations, as well as several genetic variants showing time-dependent effects, highlighting the applicability of FEMA-Long to enable novel discoveries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.