ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2026
Targeted Delivery of mRNA to the Heart via Extracellular Vesicles or Lipid Nanoparticles.
Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circular RNAs: Unlocking new avenues in cardiometabolic disease management.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- Precision Engineering of Extracellular Vesicles as Programmable Carriers for mRNA Therapeutics.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Lipid nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles: emerging cell free therapeutic platforms for hepatobiliary cancers.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Organ-Specific Extracellular Vesicles in the Treatment of Ischemic Acute Organ Injury: Mechanisms, Successes, and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient and specific delivery of mRNA to target tissues is critical for maximising therapeutic benefits while minimising off-target effects and systemic toxicity. Systemic administration of mRNA using lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) or extracellular vesicles (EVs) typically leads to predominant accumulation in the liver. We hypothesised that cardiac-specific EVs could promote enhanced relative cardiac enrichment of delivered mRNA compared with non-cardiac EVs or LNPs. In mice, intravenous administration of cardiac progenitor cell-derived EVs (CPC-EVs) achieved the greatest relative cardiac selectivity of modified mRNA encoding vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) to the heart, with reduced liver accumulation relative to non-cardiac EVs and LNPs. Cytokine profiling across seven organs revealed that LNP delivery triggered a widespread pro-inflammatory response, whereas CPC-EVs elicited only a localised and limited cytokine activation, suggesting a more favourable safety profile. Furthermore, direct intramyocardial injection of CPC-EVs not only led to efficient mRNA uptake by cardiac tissue and robust VEGF-A protein expression, but also minimal transcriptomic perturbation in the cardiac tissue, as confirmed by RNA-seq. In contrast, LNPs and non-cardiac EVs induced widespread perturbation in the transcriptome of cardiac tissue. Functionally, VEGF-A mRNA delivery via CPC-EVs markedly increased CD31 and α-SMA expression and vessel formation in ex vivo aortic ring assays, confirming enhanced angiogenic potential. Together, these findings support CPC-EVs as a promising platform for achieving enhanced cardiac delivery of mRNA, with reduced liver accumulation, limited off-target transcriptomic perturbation, a more selective cytokine response, and enhanced angiogenic activity in ex vivo assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.