ArticleJMIR aging2026
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remote Sleep-Dependent Memory Assessment in Older Adults With Cognitive Concerns: Pilot Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sleep-dependent memory consolidation (SDMC), the process by which sleep supports the transfer of memories into long-term storage, declines with age but remains underexplored in older adults with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment. Traditional SDMC assessments are typically conducted in lab settings, with limited evidence for feasibility to do these assessments at home for this clinical population. Objective: To address this, we co-designed the Sleep Memories app, which assesses overnight memory for a previously validated 32-item word-pairs task. This pilot study first explored the feasibility and acceptability of the app, including willingness to participate. Second, we explored various demographic, clinical, and subjective sleep factors associated with task completion and SDMC performance in a memory clinic sample. Methods: Within an 8-month period, we invited 141 older adults aged 50 years and above (mean 71.27, SD 7.51 y) from the Healthy Brain Ageing clinic, a specialist brain health and memory clinic in Sydney, to pilot the Sleep Memories app. Of these, 76 (mean 70.19, SD 7.75) agreed to participate. All participants underwent a full neuropsychological test battery, medical assessment, and mood assessment. Results: Sixty-eight participants completed at least 1 test of the word-pairs task. The word-pairs task completion rate for all trials was over 50%. There was 57% (39/68) completion of both evening and morning delayed recall tests. Lower willingness to participate was associated with lower global cognitive scores, poorer sleep behavior, and clinical factors. Higher task completion was associated with greater education and greater anxiety levels. User feedback indicated that the app was well-accepted and liked, although some participants reported minor technical difficulties. Conclusions: These findings support the feasibility of mobile app-based SDMC assessment in older adults at risk of cognitive decline and underscore the importance of considering individual characteristics (eg, subjective sleep factors, clinical characteristics, and education) when designing digital SDMC tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.