Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277155›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Agricultural pesticide use and Alzheimer's disease dementia prevalence across US counties in a mixed supervised-unsupervised analysis.

Leon Wang, Sara Knox, Andrew B Lawson, Abe Mollalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leon WangCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Sara KnoxDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Andrew B LawsonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Abe MollaloDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. mollalo@musc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-0698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural pesticide use represents one of the most geographically patterned environmental systems, yet most prior research has focused largely on individual compounds rather than correlated exposure regimes. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using modeled pesticide application intensity and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) dementia prevalence at the county-level across the United States. Stability-based Elastic Net screening and clustering were used to identify exposure groupings, and associations with AD prevalence were estimated using adjusted regression models. Out of 462 total pesticides screened, 112 demonstrated high selection stability and were grouped into 25 exposure clusters. Twenty clusters were significantly associated with AD dementia prevalence (p<0.05). The strongest positive associations were observed for a soil fumigation/nematicide system, an herbicide-dominant vegetation control regime, and a neuroactive insecticide system. Neuroactive insecticides and soil-intensive treatment systems were disproportionately represented among positively associated clusters, whereas systems dominated by phenoxy- and photosystem II inhibiting herbicides were more frequently aligned with inverse gradients. The fully adjusted model explained 59% of between-county variance (baseline R

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseasePesticidesAgricultureCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental ExposureHumansPrevalenceUnited StatesPesticidesAgricultural systemsAlzheimer’s disease dementiaEnvironmental epidemiologyHierarchical clusteringPesticide mixtures

Identifiers

PMID42277155
PMCPMC13529716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.