ReviewBMC microbiology2026
Role of antimicrobial peptide-based biomaterials in respiratory tract infections control.
Review in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Resolution Melting Curve Analysis (HRMA) for the Identification of Class D β-Lactamases (CHDLs) inInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In experimental models, such as those of bacterial pneumonia and tuberculosis, AMP-containing systems promote bacterial clearance and reduce inflammatory responses more effectively compared to free AMPs. The use of AMP-containing biomaterials for treating infections offers several benefits over traditional antibiotics. Isolated AMPs are less likely to develop resistance due to their multiple mechanisms of action. Additionally, AMPs kill pathogens quickly and are likely more effective when combined with the body's defense systems. Commonly used antibiotics often lead to the development of resistant bacterial strains and typically target only a limited range of Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria. Families of AMPs may exhibit broad-spectrum activity against bacteria, viruses, and fungi, but with limited or no cytotoxicity at therapeutic concentrations. Challenges with AMP therapies include production costs, potential immunogenicity, and instability; however, some of these issues could be addressed through encapsulation in biomaterials. Future directions would involve optimizing hybrid therapies that combine AMPs with antibiotics or nanomaterials for individualized treatment of RTIs. Currently, AMP-based biomaterials offer new solutions to address the challenging problem of multidrug-resistant infections that still rely on earlier drug regimens, as well as to enhance clinical outcomes. AMPs may be more effective when incorporated into biomaterials designed to facilitate delivery, enhance efficacy, and/or maintain activity. This review provides an overview of the use of AMP-based biomaterials to control RTIs, focusing on their mechanisms of action, applications, and potential benefits. Antimicrobial peptides target bacterial membranes, prevent biofilm formation, and can modulate host immune response, demonstrating effectiveness against common RTI pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, biomaterial platforms can facilitate controlled release, improved stability, and targeted administration to the respiratory mucosa, thereby overcoming rapid clearance and enzymatic degradation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.