SynthesisBMC public health2026
Determinants of early interruption of exclusive breastfeeding: a qualitative meta-synthesis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast milk is recognized as the ideal source of nutrition for infants; however, the widespread early interruption of exclusive breastfeeding within the first six months postpartum constitutes a major public health challenge. Despite clear recommendations from the World Health Organization and strong maternal intentions to exclusively breastfeed, complex factors continue to lead to involuntary interruption, and it is estimated that only 44% of infants worldwide are exclusively breastfed. This unplanned cessation not only deprives infants of irreplaceable nutritional and immunological benefits and increases the risk of morbidity, but also negatively affects maternal psychological well-being and results in substantial economic losses. Current evidence on the determinants of this interruption remains scattered across single-region studies, with a lack of cross-cultural and systematic synthesis of qualitative findings. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and meta-synthesize global qualitative evidence to identify the multidimensional determinants of early interruption of exclusive breastfeeding, thereby providing an evidence base for developing multilevel and effective intervention strategies.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for publications from March 6, 2021 to March 6, 2026. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and the JBI meta-aggregation approach was used to summarize and synthesize the findings.
resultsA total of 33 studies were included, from which 252 findings were extracted. These findings were grouped into 10 categories and further synthesized into three integrated findings: mothers turning to supplementary feeding amid feeding uncertainty and physical and psychological burden; insufficient social support systems weakening the continuation of exclusive breastfeeding; and sociocultural factors, infrastructure gaps, and the commercial power of formula milk jointly normalizing supplementary feeding.
conclusionsEarly interruption of exclusive breastfeeding is influenced by multilevel factors involving mothers, families and communities, healthcare services, work systems, sociocultural contexts, and commercial marketing. Future efforts should move beyond mother-focused health education and establish comprehensive support strategies covering families, communities, healthcare institutions, workplaces, and policy settings to reduce avoidable interruption of exclusive breastfeeding.
trial registrationPROSPERO Number CRD420251179108.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.