ArticleBMC nursing2026
Understanding communication challenges in nursing care of patients with limited health literacy: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited health literacy affects millions globally, impairing patient understanding, treatment adherence, and health outcomes. Nurses, as primary healthcare educators, navigate complex communication challenges with vulnerable patients. However, research examining nurses' lived experiences of managing these challenges remains limited, particularly regarding how organizational and systemic factors enable or constrain communication effectiveness. This study aimed to explore registered nurses' experiences, perceived barriers, adaptive communication strategies, and systemic factors influencing nurse-patient communication in acute care settings with diverse patient populations.
methodsDescriptive qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews with 18 registered nurses across emergency, intensive care, medical-surgical, and specialized acute care units. Data were analyzed using Braun & Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis approach. Trustworthiness was enhanced through member checking, peer debriefing, comprehensive audit trail documentation, and prolonged engagement with data.
findingsFour interconnected themes emerged: (1) Multifaceted Communication Barriers encompassing language limitations, cultural-epistemological incongruence, and foundational knowledge gaps; (2) Strategic Communication Approaches including simplified language, visual demonstrations, teach-back methods, and family engagement; (3) Systemic Obstacles comprising inadequate resources, time constraints, unclear policies, and institutional ambivalence substantially constraining communication effectiveness; and (4) Emotional Labor and Professional Resilience capturing nurses' psychological experiences, moral distress, and coping mechanisms.
conclusionsEffective nurse-patient communication with individuals with limited health literacy requires interventions at individual, interpersonal, and organizational levels. Findings suggest that communication effectiveness is substantially shaped by organisational factors staffing, resourcing, policy, and accountability and that framing communication gaps as primarily individual competence deficits misrepresents what is, in large part, a structural problem. Individual skill and professional effort remain important; however, they operate within organisational parameters that participants frequently experienced as inadequate. Healthcare organisations must allocate dedicated resources, establish explicit patient education policies, and create accountability mechanisms to enable nurses to communicate effectively with patients with limited health literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.