ArticleHead & face medicine2026
Evaluating the accuracy of sex estimation from human tooth volume: leveraging automated AI segmentation and comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurately estimating biological sex is a fundamental step in forensic odontology, anthropology and archaeology. Tooth volume has been recognized as a valuable feature for sex estimation. However, dental morphology exhibits population-specific variations, which remains underexplored in the northern Han Chinese population. Furthermore, manual segmentation of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images is prone to subjectivity and error, and conventional modeling approaches may offer limited predictive accuracy. This study aimed to address these limitations by integrating automated artificial intelligence (AI) segmentation with multiple machine learning algorithms to enhance objectivity and predictive performance in sex prediction.
methodsA cohort of 398 CBCT images was analyzed using a fully automated deep learning system for tooth segmentation, and a final cohort of 357 samples (185 females, 172 males) was retained. Volumetric data for teeth were automatically calculated, with missing values imputed via multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE). Four machine learning algorithms were applied to build binary classification models for sex estimation. Hyperparameter optimization was achieved through nested cross-validation, and model performance was evaluated on a test set using a comprehensive set of metrics.
resultsAll 16 measured teeth showed significantly differences in volume between sexes, with males consistently showing larger mean volumes across all tooth types compared to females. Nested cross-validation showed that all models exhibited promising performance for sex estimation with mean ACC above 0.77 and mean AUC values at or above 0.85. On the test set, the models achieved accuracies ranging from 0.803 to 0.859 and AUCs from 0.893 to 0.903. SHAP interpretability analysis highlighted canines as having the greatest impact on predictions.
conclusionsThis study is the first to demonstrate the significant sexual dimorphism of tooth volumes in a north Chinese population. We utilized an AI-based automated segmentation accompanied with machine learning modeling pipeline to accurately estimate sex using tooth volume features, offering a valuable approach for forensic and anthropological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.