Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277898›Full record

ReviewCell communication and signaling : CCS2026

Tunneling nanotubes: a new dimension of intercellular communication and recent progress.

Xinyu Dong, Yan Xuan, Muning Wang, Siyao Chang, Xuesong Hu, Zhiyang Han

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Emerging Roles of Cytoneme-Mediated Signaling in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinyu DongDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yan XuanDepartment of Breast and Vascular Surgery, Harbin the First Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Muning WangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Siyao ChangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Xuesong HuDepartment of Pediatrics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Zhiyang HanDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. hanzhiyang@hrbmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Chronic Disease Management of the National Health Commission Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center GWJJMB202510021059Provincial Guiding Project of the 2025 Heilongjiang Undergraduate Innovation Training Program S202510226067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication between cells can occur over long distances through the diffusion of soluble mediators and the delivery of extracellular vesicles (EVs), and over short distances through contact-dependent junctional structures formed between adjacent cells. Recent studies on tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) suggest that, in certain systems, cells may engage in relatively direct material exchange that does not rely on diffusion or stochastic uptake. TNTs typically appear as thin, bridge-like membranous protrusions spanning intercellular gaps. They are supported by F-actin and may incorporate microtubules, thereby enabling intercellular transfer ranging from ions and small signaling molecules to RNA, protein complexes, and even organelles. A major challenge in the field, however, is the lack of unified definitions and evidentiary standards. The absence of universal specific markers, the fragility of these structures, and the limitations of static two-dimensional imaging make TNTs prone to confusion with filopodia or cytonemes, cytokinetic bridges, apparent transfer arising from EV deposition or uptake, and tumor microtubes (TMs), which undermines functional attribution and cross-study comparability. Guided by a minimum evidence set, this review proposes a reproducible identification workflow, systematically summarizes TNT structural heterogeneity, including thin versus thick TNTs and open versus closed termini or gap junction-like contacts, and relates these features to transport capacity and transport modalities. We also stratify disease-associated findings by strength of evidence to distinguish areas of consensus from ongoing controversies. We further highlight the double-edged nature of TNTs: they may support metabolic rescue and tissue repair through organelle sharing, yet they can also be exploited by pathogens, tumors, and pathogenic aggregates to facilitate stealthy spread, therapeutic tolerance, and pathological propagation. Finally, we summarize current intervention entry points and their limitations, and argue that future work should build on in vivo dynamic evidence, incorporate controls that distinguish TNT-mediated transfer from vesicle-based routes, and pursue cell-type-specific mechanistic dissection to establish a more robust chain of evidence. Such efforts may enable the identification and mitigation of disease-associated detrimental TNT activities while preserving physiological roles, thereby informing feasibility assessment and early validation for clinical translation.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationNanotubesAnimalsCell Membrane StructuresHumansTunneling NanotubesCell–cell connectionsDisease mechanismsIntercellular communicationIntercellular transferTranslational interventionTunneling nanotubes

Identifiers

PMID42277898
PMCPMC13483842

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.