Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277901›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2026

Predicting Post-Radiotherapy Epigenetic Age Acceleration From Pre-Treatment Data Using a Machine Learning Framework in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Runze Yan, Guanlin Dai, Yufen Lin, Yuhua Wu, Jiaying Lu, Deborah W Bruner, Andrew H Miller, Nabil F Saba, Xiao Hu, Canhua Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Runze YanNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6558-4567
Guanlin DaiNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Yufen LinNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Yuhua WuNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Jiaying LuNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Deborah W BrunerNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Andrew H MillerWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Nabil F SabaWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Xiao HuNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Canhua XiaoNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1391-5325

Funding

Epigenetic Mechanisms of Inflammation and Fatigue in Head and Neck Cancer PatientsR01NR015783 · NINR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI XIAO, CANHUA · 2016 to 2018
$1.5M
National Cancer Institute, Cairo University P30CA13829NINR NIH HHS K99/R00NR014587NINR NIH HHS R01NR015783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpigenetic age acceleration in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiotherapy has been linked to adverse treatment outcomes. Understanding a patient's likely epigenetic aging response prior to radiotherapy has the potential to inform healthcare planning and clinical decision-making; however, current methods cannot effectively predict these changes throughout treatment, particularly without expensive assays of epigenetic alterations.

methodsThis study developed and validated a machine learning framework to predict EAA following radiotherapy, utilizing pre-radiotherapy (Time 1) sociodemographic information, symptom reports, clinical measurements, and immune biomarkers. Various machine learning models were explored to forecast EAA across three post-treatment clinic stages: Immediately post-radiotherapy (Time 2), six months (Time 3), and 12 months post-radiotherapy (Time 4).

resultsOur results demonstrate that: (1) deep learning methods, particularly TabNet, outperform conventional algorithms with an average RMSE of 4.08 (SD = 0.32); (2) predictions are most accurate immediately post-treatment (Time 2 RMSE: 4.87); (3) baseline immune markers, including absolute eosinophil count and hemoglobin levels, are consistent predictors across timepoints; and (4) specific patient subgroups show distinct prediction accuracies (RMSE range: 1.70-4.34).

conclusionThese results suggest that pre-treatment demographic and clinical data effectively predict post-treatment EAA trajectories without expensive epigenetic assays, enabling cost-effective early identification of high-risk patients for potential targeted interventions before adverse effects manifest.

Indexed as

AgingEpigenesis, GeneticHead and Neck NeoplasmsMachine LearningAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Modelsdeep learningepigenetic age accelerationhead and neck cancerlongitudinal predictionmachine learningradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42277901
PMCPMC13259967

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.