ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Limited Clinical Benefit of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Ovarian Cancer with Opportunities in Selected Subtypes.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Guided Multi-Cohort Transcriptomic Profiling IdentifiesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains one of the most lethal gynecologic malignancies, largely owing to advanced-stage presentation, high rates of relapse, and the eventual emergence of therapeutic resistance. Despite the transformative success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across multiple solid tumors, their clinical impact in ovarian cancer has been comparatively modest. This literature review provides a comprehensive synthesis of recent advances in ICI strategies for ovarian cancer (OC), with particular emphasis on phase II and III clinical trials evaluating programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), and T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain-containing-3 (TIM-3)-directed therapies. Accumulating evidence indicates that PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy yields limited clinical activity in unselected OC populations, with low objective response rates and minimal survival benefit. Dual checkpoint blockade with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors demonstrates enhanced antitumor activity, particularly in clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC), albeit at the expense of increased immune-related toxicity. Large randomized trials incorporating ICI into first-line chemotherapy or maintenance settings have largely failed to improve outcomes in biomarker-unselected cohorts. Available evidence demonstrates that combinatorial approaches integrating ICI with anti-angiogenic agents, PARP inhibitors, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy provide modest benefit in selected molecular and histologic subgroups. Early-phase investigations of TIM-3-targeting strategies further expand the immunotherapeutic landscape, although clinical efficacy remains preliminary. Current evidence underscores that OC is not uniformly responsive to immunotherapy and that rational combination strategies, biomarker-driven patient selection, and improved understanding of tumor immune microenvironment heterogeneity are essential to unlocking the full therapeutic potential of ICI in this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.