ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Electrospun Carbothane-Based Drug-Enriched Scaffolds for Cardiovascular Devices: Drug Release, Hemocompatibility, Endothelialization, and Immunological Characterization.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polyurethane (PU) is widely used in medical products due to its biocompatibility and mechanical properties. Electrospinning (ES) was employed to produce PU-based scaffolds intended for cardiovascular devices (CVD) from blends of Carbothane (Carb) with human serum albumin (HSA), dimethylacetamide (DMA), and drugs. Sirolimus (SRL)-an immunosuppressive/anti-proliferative drug-and diclofenac (DF)-a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-were introduced into ES blends to produce drug-enriched scaffolds that prevent inflammation and cell overgrowth. The biocompatibility, stability, and mechanical properties of the scaffolds and SRL release were studied. The scaffolds possessed good mechanical properties and were stable in PBS and blood plasma (BP) for 120 days. The minimal SRL release rate was observed for the scaffold 3%Carb/10%HSA/DMA/SRL. A study of scaffold interaction with blood demonstrated good hemocompatibility of most scaffolds. A study of human gingival fibroblasts, endothelial cells (HUVEC and EA.hy926), and vascular smooth muscle cell interaction with scaffolds in vitro demonstrated variability in cell viability and pro-inflammatory interleukin IL-6 secretion, depending on both the scaffold composition and the cell type. The incorporation of DF into scaffolds decreased the concentration of IL-6 in the culture medium. The scaffold 3%Carb/10%HSA/DMA/SRL is the best choice for CVD in terms of hemocompatibility, endothelialization, and the induction of minimal inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.