ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Evolving Approaches to Bacterial Identification: A Review of Classical and Modern Techniques.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infectious diseases remain a major global health concern, with a growing burden of antimicrobial resistance and consequent higher mortality in the human population. Accurate bacterial identification is fundamental across clinical, veterinary, agricultural, and research settings, supporting effective diagnosis, antimicrobial stewardship, infection control, food safety, and environmental monitoring; however, conventional approaches are limited by time constraints, reduced sensitivity, and challenges in detecting fastidious or uncultivable organisms. This review provides a comprehensive overview of classical and advanced methods, including microscopy, culture, biochemical testing, immunological and serological assays, proteomic and spectroscopy-based techniques, and molecular approaches, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), digital PCR, DNA hybridization, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, whole-genome sequencing, and metagenomics. The integration of artificial intelligence has further enhanced analytical performance. Nevertheless, harmonization of bioinformatics frameworks remains essential, as variability in algorithm-defined cut-off values limits standardized implementation of whole-genome sequencing in routine laboratories. Emerging technologies, including CRISPR-based diagnostics and phage- and nanomaterial-based detection systems, offer promising alternatives. Overall, the integration of these approaches is expected to improve the accuracy, speed, and applicability of bacterial identification across diverse settings; however, these advances should be implemented cautiously, with standardization remaining a key priority alongside technological modernization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.