ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Is Routine Monitoring of TNF-α Inhibitor Levels and Antibodies in Pediatric IBD Justified in the Era of Personalized Medicine.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with an onset in childhood is characterized by a more extensive phenotype, a more aggressive clinical course, and a higher risk of long-term complications, including growth retardation, compared to adult-onset disease. While tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are the cornerstone of therapy, achieving sustained remission in children is often hindered by unique pharmacokinetic challenges, such as accelerated drug clearance and a higher propensity for immunogenicity. This review explores the evolving role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), specifically the paradigm shift from reactive to proactive strategies. While proactive TDM remains a subject of debate in adult IBD, emerging pediatric data strongly support its routine use to optimize treatment durability and prevent secondary loss of response. Evidence-based target trough concentrations for pediatric patients are critical for achieving mucosal healing: 8-13 µg/mL at week 6 and >5-7 µg/mL during maintenance for infliximab, and >13-14 µg/mL post-induction for adalimumab. Beyond clinical outcomes, this review emphasizes the economic viability of proactive TDM, which has been shown to reduce total healthcare expenditures by 18-30% by minimizing hospitalizations and avoiding premature treatment switches. By integrating pharmacological data with clinical pathways, proactive TDM serves as an essential tool for personalized medicine, ensuring safer and more cost-effective management of pediatric IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.