ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Chronic Subdural Hematoma: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and the Emerging Role of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurological condition, particularly in the elderly, characterized by a complex pathophysiology involving inflammation, angiogenesis, and recurrent microhemorrhages rather than a purely mechanical process. Although surgical evacuation remains the standard treatment, recurrence rates remain considerable, prompting the search for alternative and adjunctive therapies. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on the pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches, and management of CSDH, with particular emphasis on middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE). A comprehensive literature search of major medical databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, was performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and meta-analyses. Available evidence suggests that MMAE may reduce recurrence rates and the need for reoperation, particularly when used as an adjunct to surgery. However, results from RCTs remain mixed, and not all studies have demonstrated significant benefit on primary clinical endpoints. While MMAE has emerged as a promising minimally invasive approach targeting the vascular supply of hematoma membranes, further high-quality studies are required to establish standardized indications, optimize procedural techniques, and clarify long-term outcomes and comparative effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.