ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction as a Multisystem Syndrome: A Mechanistically Anchored Endotype Framework for Precision Therapy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for approximately half of all heart failure cases worldwide and remains associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and limited therapeutic efficacy. This persistent therapeutic gap reflects not only clinical heterogeneity but also a fundamental conceptual limitation: HFpEF has been approached as a myocardial disorder despite mounting evidence that it represents a multisystem syndrome. In this perspective, we integrate current pathophysiological and clinical evidence into a mechanistically anchored endotype framework based on dominant biological axes. We propose four overlapping endotypes-cardiorenal, fibrotic-inflammatory, metabolic-adiposity, and microvascular-energetic-and align contemporary and emerging therapies with these domains. We further outline a pragmatic roadmap for biomarker-guided stratification and propose principles for next-generation clinical trial design based on mechanistic enrichment. This framework provides a clinically actionable structure for biomarker-guided stratification and supports mechanism-based therapeutic selection in HFpEF. Aligning dominant biological drivers with targeted interventions generates testable hypotheses for endotype-enriched clinical trials and precision treatment strategies. Prospective validation of this approach may facilitate a transition from uniform management toward individualized, biology-driven care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.