Evidence mapPaperPMID 42279231Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Stem Cell Therapy for Parkinson's Disease: A Mechanistically Distinct Role for Muse Cells.

Michael H Mesches, Ann-Charlotte Granholm, Daniel Paredes, Karin Mesches, Yo Oguma, Mari Dezawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael H MeschesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-7413
Ann-Charlotte GranholmDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9685-7599
Daniel ParedesKnoebel Institute for Healthy Aging, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9635-8001
Karin MeschesSciTechEdit International LLC, Highlands Ranch, CO 80130, USA.
Yo OgumaDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Histology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan.
Mari DezawaDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Histology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8575, Miyagi, Japan.

Funding

Phase I Cell Therapy for Maintaining Cholinergic Circuits in the Spectrum of Alzheimer’s DiseaseR01AG081356 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Greg A. Gerhardt, Jorge E Quintero · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG081356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell replacement therapy is a promising investigational approach for Parkinson's disease (PD), a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Although current PD therapies provide symptomatic relief, none halt or reverse disease progression. Early transplantation studies using fetal dopaminergic neurons provided proof of concept for PD cell replacement, with recent efforts focusing on pluripotent stem cell-derived dopaminergic progenitors that are now entering clinical testing. These strategies face challenges, however, including immune compatibility, tumorigenic risk, and the need for controlled differentiation and functional integration. Multi-lineage differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells are endogenous, non-tumorigenic pluripotent-like stem cells that home to sites of tissue injury and differentiate in response to the host microenvironment. A targeted literature search of PubMed and Scopus, however, did not identify prior reviews specifically addressing Muse cells in the context of PD, highlighting a gap in the literature. Here, we examine current limitations of established cell-replacement approaches and consider whether Muse cells may represent a mechanistically distinct cell source. Early clinical studies of Muse cell therapy in stroke and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis suggest an encouraging safety profile and preliminary signals of potential therapeutic benefit, although these findings are based on small, early-stage trials and require confirmation. The evidence supporting Muse cell therapy in PD is currently limited to a single preclinical animal study, supported by mechanistic in vitro findings and indirect evidence from other neurologic disease models; therefore, its relevance to PD remains to be established, and current evidence is insufficient to support conclusions regarding clinical efficacy. Together, these observations provide a rationale for further targeted preclinical investigation and support the systematic evaluation of Muse cells as a mechanistically distinct candidate for regenerative therapy in PD.

Indexed as

cell replacement therapyMuse cellsParkinson’s diseasepluripotent cellsstem cells

Identifiers

PMID42279231
PMCPMC13257467

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.