ReviewCancers2026
Circulating Tumor DNA as Emerging Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Prostate Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond prostate-specific antigen: ctDNA as an early compass for treatment adaptation in metastatic prostate cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Inflammatory and Epigenetic Biomarkers in Prostate Disease: Current Evidence, Clinical Limitations, and Future Multimarker Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Circulating tumour DNA in mCRPC: bridging tumour biology and real-time treatment monitoring.Frontiers in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Peripheral blood biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: distinguishing predictive from prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay is an emerging non-invasive diagnostic approach providing real-time insights into the heterogeneous tumor molecular landscape of advanced prostate cancer, overcoming the limitations of traditional tissue biopsies and PSA. Detection methods include droplet digital PCR, next-generation sequencing, and new epigenomic and fragmentomic strategies (investigational) designed to improve sensitivity in cases of low ctDNA shedding. While ctDNA's role in localized prostate cancer is limited, it offers significant prognostic value in metastatic cases, where high ctDNA levels correlate with shorter survival. Additionally, longitudinal ctDNA monitoring can predict treatment response and identify emerging resistance mechanisms, including androgen receptor alterations associated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor therapy and BRCA reversion mutations linked to PARP inhibitors. Importantly, liquid biopsy enables genomic characterization to inform treatment decision-making, particularly in clinical scenarios where tissue biopsy is challenging, such as bone-only disease. However, the widespread clinical implementation of ctDNA analysis is hindered by several analytical challenges, including low sensitivity in localized disease and low disease burden, and the risk of false positives due to clonal hematopoiesis. Furthermore, greater efforts are required to standardize pre-analytical workflows and post-analytical data interpretation and reporting across institutions. This review aims to summarize the evolving role of cfDNA technologies in localized and advanced prostate cancer, highlighting their prognostic and predictive value and their role in uncovering mechanisms of treatment resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.