ReviewCancers2026
Racial Disparity in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Risk-Predictive and Actionable Biomarkers for Early Intervention.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive precursor to invasive breast cancer. DCIS incidence continues to rise, yet its clinical management remains constrained by the absence of reliable biomarkers that can adequately distinguish indolent lesions from those with high invasive potential, to circumvent over- or under-treatment. Black women with DCIS are significantly more likely to progress to invasive breast cancer, are disproportionately diagnosed with high-grade, hormone receptor-negative lesions, and experience elevated risk of recurrence and mortality relative to White women with DCIS. These disparities persist despite comparable access to screening and treatment, suggesting underlying biological and tissue microenvironmental factors. This review synthesizes emerging evidence implicating early molecular and systemic changes that may be driving the disparity in DCIS progression. We highlight racial distinctions in interconnected pathways involving Wnt/β-catenin signaling, metabolic and nutritional dysregulation, immune microenvironment remodeling, and cellular tolerance of genomic instability. We further discuss how epigenetic alterations, obesity-associated inflammation, and immune dysregulation may arise during the pre-invasive stage that intersect with social and environmental exposures to influence racial differences in lesion fate. We spotlight candidate biomarkers disproportionately associated with aggressive disease in Black women-including KIFC1, a mediator of centrosome clustering and genomic instability tolerance, and ACKR1/DARC, a regulator of chemokine gradients and immune trafficking-as potential drivers of progression-permissive states. This review advances an integrated, equity-informed framework for DCIS progression that links early tumor evolution to coordinated alterations in genomic instability, immune regulation, metabolic signaling, and stress-adaptive pathways. Importantly, we propose that DCIS progression is governed not by isolated molecular alterations but by coordinated programs that enable survival under genomic and immunologic stress. Current clinical risk assays, which primarily capture tumor-intrinsic proliferation and hormone signaling, do not fully resolve these pathways and may therefore incompletely reflect biologically meaningful racial disparities. This synthesis underscores the need for pathway-level, microenvironment-informed, and population-representative approaches to DCIS risk stratification. Advancing such frameworks will be essential for identifying actionable biomarkers, refining early intervention strategies, and ultimately reducing racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.