ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Bayes at the Bedside: Biomarkers in Situations of Clinical Uncertainty.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laboratory biomarkers influence a large proportion of clinical decision-making, yet their application is often limited by incomplete validation and context-dependent interpretability. Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), a biomarker of neuroaxonal injury in multiple sclerosis (MS), exemplifies this challenge. Although associated with inflammatory activity, lesion burden, and disability progression at the population level, its translation into individual patient management remains problematic. In this Perspective, we synthesise current literature on sNfL in MS and apply Bayesian diagnostic reasoning as a conceptual framework for its interpretation in individualised MS care. The need for such a framework arises from the heterogeneity of MS pathology, in which subclinical inflammation and neurodegeneration may occur as partly dissociated processes that are incompletely captured by clinical and radiological measures. Consequently, substantial uncertainty persists in disease monitoring and therapeutic decision-making. In this setting, sNfL may provide complementary information, but its interpretation is complicated by biological variability, methodological differences, confounding factors (e.g., age, body mass index, and comorbidities), and the absence of universally validated thresholds. We argue that sNfL should be interpreted within a Bayesian framework, in which biomarker results modify rather than determine the probability of disease activity. Its clinical utility is likely greatest when the pre-test probability is intermediate but remains constrained by uncertainty in both test characteristics and clinical context, leading to uncertainty propagation. Overall, sNfL should be interpreted longitudinally and within multimodal clinical decision models. Further prospective studies are needed to better define its role in individualised MS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.