Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42279769›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Advances in Foodborne Pathogen Detection: From Conventional Confirmation to Integrated and Intelligent Platforms.

Xiang Pan, Xiong Ding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiang PanKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Xiong DingKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0437-0589

Funding

China Youth Development Foundation 2023YFD2402800Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Department BE2023725National Natural Science Foundation of China 82373629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foodborne pathogens pose a major challenge for public health, food safety regulation, and industrial quality control. Effective surveillance, outbreak tracing, and early warning for foodborne microbial contamination require rapid, reliable detection methods. Conventional culture-based methods are still essential for regulatory confirmation since they recover viable isolates and support downstream verification. However, their long turnaround time, labor-intensive procedures, and limited throughput restrict their use in rapid screening and on-site testing. In recent years, immunological assays, nucleic acid amplification and recognition methods, biosensors, microfluidic systems, CRISPR-Cas platforms, mass spectrometry, sequencing technologies, and artificial intelligence-assisted analysis have expanded the detection toolbox. These methods improve speed, sensitivity, portability, and multiplexing capacity, but their performance still depends on food-matrix properties, sample pretreatment, and application conditions. This review compares representative methods in terms of analytical principle, sample pretreatment, sensitivity, specificity, assay time, viable-cell discrimination, field applicability, and standardization potential. In our opinion, culture-based methods are central for confirmation, while emerging technologies are better suited for rapid screening, integrated analysis, and point-of-need testing. Nevertheless, matrix interference, limited validation in naturally contaminated samples, insufficient viable/dead-cell discrimination, and weak cross-platform consistency remain key barriers to routine use.

Indexed as

biosensorsCRISPR-Casfoodborne pathogensfood safety monitoringmicrofluidicsnucleic acid amplificationrapid detection

Identifiers

PMID42279769
PMCPMC13256353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.