Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42279773›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Nutritional Regulation of Poultry Meat Quality: Research Progress from Phenotypic Improvement to Mechanism Elucidation.

Lizhi Niu, Chenxu Wang, Ke Wu, Jinhua Cheng, Zhi Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lizhi NiuThe Animal Science and Technology College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 255300, China.
Chenxu WangThe Animal Science and Technology College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 255300, China.
Ke WuThe Animal Science and Technology College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 255300, China.
Jinhua ChengThe Animal Science and Technology College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 255300, China.
Zhi YangJoint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6636-4606

Funding

Zhi Yang CARS-42-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry meat quality, as a key determinant of consumer acceptance and industrial economic efficiency, is shaped through the synergistic regulation of multiple factors including genetic background, husbandry management practices, and nutritional strategies. Among these, nutritional regulation has emerged as one of the most promising avenues for enhancing meat quality due to its high degree of operability and precision in intervention. This study systematically reviews the effects and mechanisms of nutritional strategies on poultry meat quality. These interventions entail modulating dietary protein and amino acids, fats and fatty acids, minerals and vitamins, alongside incorporating plant extracts and functional additives. It delves into the latest research advances in nutritional regulation within poultry meat quality. By dissecting the physiological and molecular mechanisms through which different nutritional strategies enhance meat quality, this study elucidates the scientific rationale for their effects via pathways regulating muscle metabolism, redox homeostasis, and microstructure. Accordingly, this review provides theoretical foundations and research directions for producing high-quality, high-value-added poultry meat products through precision nutritional strategies.

Indexed as

functional feed additivesgut–muscle axismuscle fiber conversionoxidative stabilityprecision nutrition

Identifiers

PMID42279773
PMCPMC13257232

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.