ReviewNutrients2026
Sports Drinks for Rehydration, Amelioration of Fatigue, and Recovery from Exertion.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sports drinks have traditionally been formulated as carbohydrate-electrolyte beverages to support fluid replacement and energy provision during exercise. However, commercially available and experimentally tested formulations now include amino acids, proteins, phytochemicals, caffeine, menthol, ketone-related nutrients, and other functional ingredients intended to support thermoregulation, performance, or post-exercise recovery. This narrative review summarizes evidence on sports drinks and related functional beverages, with emphasis on hydration, gastric emptying and intestinal absorption, thermoregulation, biomarkers of hydration and recovery, and potential effects beyond hydration, including fatigue, muscle and organ damage, inflammation, and immune responses. Because available studies vary widely in population, exercise mode, environmental conditions, beverage composition, intake timing, and outcome measures, the evidence should be interpreted cautiously. A functional distinction is made between hydration-oriented carbohydrate-electrolyte beverages and beverages primarily designed for ergogenic or recovery-oriented purposes. Current evidence supports the practical value of appropriate fluid, electrolyte, and carbohydrate intake for maintaining hydration and exercise performance, whereas evidence for broader effects on inflammation, immunodepression, organ protection, and recovery remains context-dependent. Future studies should differentiate acute responses from longer-term adaptations, consider population-specific needs, and use standardized, context-appropriate biomarkers and ecologically valid protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.