ReviewNutrients2026
Reassessing Mandatory Folic Acid Fortification for Neural Tube Defect Prevention: Evidence, Uncertainty, and Policy Implications.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesFolate is a water-soluble B vitamin that is essential for DNA synthesis, cell division and proper growth and development, particularly during pregnancy to prevent neural tube defects (NTDs). A large, fully randomized clinical trial (RCT) from the United Kingdom in 1991 (the Medical Research Council (MRC) Vitamin Study), where participants had a prior NTD-affected pregnancy, demonstrated a 72% reduction in NTD recurrence in the folic acid treatment group. Based on this data and the high rate of unplanned pregnancies, about 90 countries fortify cereal grains with folic acid with the goal to prevent NTDs during pregnancy. This critical narrative review and policy perspective addresses the difference between folate and folic acid and between supplementation and food fortification, critically evaluates the data in three recent publications supporting mandatory fortification of food products with folic acid, and presents the case for a more personalized medicine approach to the prevention of NTDs.
methodsRelevant literature was identified through PubMed searches using the keywords "fortification", "folic acid", and "systematic review" or by Googe Scholar Alerts. Three studies were identified based on relevance to the topic and publication dates between January and February of 2026.
resultsThere is a disregard in published studies, which use pre-fortification groups as controls, for the confounding issue of changing socioeconomic factors over time. Improved socioeconomic conditions are associated with subsequent decreases in NTD prevalence regardless of fortification.
conclusionsThe efficacy of folic acid supplementation for recurrent NTDs is supported by evidence-based literature, but evidence in favor of mandatory food fortification to prevent NTDs is limited. Food fortification is widely debated, raises numerous ethical issues, and has broad implications for human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.