ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sensing Technologies and Physiological Parameters for Real-Time Driver Drowsiness Detection: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Driver drowsiness detection has become an important application of sensor-based monitoring systems aimed at improving road safety. This review focuses on sensing technologies and physiological parameters used for real-time drowsiness detection in drivers. The surveyed approaches are categorized into physiological sensing methods, including electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG), galvanic skin response (GSR), and photoplethysmography (PPG), and mechanical sensing methods, including respiration rate, eye blinking, head movement, yawning, and steering wheel gripping force. Each method is analyzed from a sensor system perspective, considering signal acquisition principles, measurement location, and practical deployment constraints. In addition, the reviewed techniques are evaluated based on real-time capability, level of sensor attachment, cost, restriction of user movement, and suitability for standalone operation. The comparison highlights that mechanical sensing approaches provide non-invasive and cost-effective solutions; however, they are sensitive to environmental noise and behavioral variability. In contrast, physiological sensing methods offer more direct and earlier indicators of fatigue-related changes in biosignals, although they typically require wearable or contact-based sensors and more complex acquisition systems. The review further indicates that multimodal sensor fusion is increasingly being adopted to improve robustness and reliability in real-world driving conditions. Overall, this work provides a structured overview of sensing modalities and highlights key considerations for designing efficient, real-time driver monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.