ArticleDevelopmental science2026
How Uncertainty Affects Children's Exploration and Exploitation in Statistical Learning.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental input is inherently uncertain at both global and local levels. Depending on the level of uncertainty, cognitive systems dynamically adapt by shifting attention between exploiting learned regularities and exploring less predictable alternatives. While these dynamics are well documented in adults, how local and global uncertainty jointly influences children's exploration-exploitation strategies during statistical learning remains unclear. Combining eye-tracking with a probabilistic cueing task, this study quantified local and global uncertainty on a trial-by-trial basis to examine their effects on children's attentional preferences for cues differing in predictive value. Overall, 158 children aged 4 to 13 years passively viewed cue-target sequences in which target shapes were predicted by cues with high- and low-transitional probabilities. Results showed that under high global uncertainty, high local uncertainty biased attention toward high-predictive cues, indicating uncertainty-exploitation, whereas low local uncertainty biased attention toward low-predictive cues, suggesting certainty-exploration. Conversely, under low global uncertainty, attentional strategies reversed, shifting toward certainty-exploitation and uncertainty-exploration. These patterns were amplified in older children but attenuated in younger ones. These findings support a developmental dynamic model of exploration-exploitation in which children's attention strategies are jointly regulated by local and global uncertainty and undergo systematic change across childhood. SUMMARY: How local and global uncertainty jointly shapes the development of children's exploration-exploitation behavior during statistical learning across different ages remains poorly understood. Using eye-tracking in a probabilistic learning task, we showed that 4-13-year-olds adapt their information sampling and choices in response to overarching and trial-by-trial uncertainty. Under high global uncertainty, children relied on local uncertainty for exploitation and exploration; under low global uncertainty, they favored certainty-driven exploitation and uncertainty-driven exploration. These uncertainty-regulated strategies were amplified in older children but attenuated in younger children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.