ReviewMissouri medicine
Current Concepts in the Management of Cerebral Aneurysms.
Review in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral aneurysms represent a heterogeneous group of vascular lesions whose clinical behavior ranges from incidental, asymptomatic findings to catastrophic aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Despite major advances in neuroimaging, microsurgical technique, and endovascular technology, the management of both ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms remains complex and highly individualized. This review examines current concepts in aneurysm pathobiology, natural history, risk stratification, and contemporary treatment strategies, emphasizing durable clinical principles that transcend evolving technology. Particular attention is given to the balance between conservative surveillance and intervention in unruptured aneurysms, as well as the time-critical priorities, complications, and neurocritical care considerations in ruptured aneurysms. The relative roles of microsurgical and endovascular therapies are discussed through the lens of long-term durability, retreatment risk, and patientspecific anatomy. Ultimately, optimal outcomes depend less on any single technique than on disciplined clinical judgment, longitudinal thinking, and true interdisciplinary collaboration within experienced neurovascular centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42281625PMC13252896What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.